We carried out a review of the data available to us about Home Instead Senior Care on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Home Instead Senior Care, you can give feedback on this service.
Home Instead Senior Care is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to a range of people including older adults. Not everyone using Home Instead Senior Care receives a regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 14 people using the service.
People were kept safe from potential harm and abuse, by a staff team who had received training in safeguarding. Risks had been assessed and minimised where possible, with people being supported to take positive risks. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs. Staff had been recruited safely. People received their medicines when required and by competent staff. The risk of infection was reduced by staff who had been trained in infection control, and used personal protective equipment. There were systems in place to learn and improve when things went wrong.
Before a service was provided, an assessment of people’s needs was completed. Staff received the training and support to provide effective care. Staff worked in partnership with healthcare providers to provide consistent support when people moved between services. People had access to healthcare professionals and were supported to maintain good health. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported people in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act were being complied with and any restrictions were assessed to ensure they were lawful, and the least restrictive option.
People were treated with kindness and compassion by a staff team that knew them well. People received emotional support when they needed. People, and where appropriate, their relatives were consulted around their care and support and their views were acted upon. People’s privacy and dignity were respected, and staff promoted people’s independence.
People received personalised care responsive to their needs. People’s care plans were written with them, and people told us they reflected their needs. There was a complaints policy and form, available to people. Complaints had been utilised to improve the service.
There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
There was an open and inclusive culture within the service which was shared by people, staff and managers. There was a robust governance system in place helping to provide a high quality service. People, their families and staff were engaged and involved in the running to the service. Systems were in place to ensure the service learnt and improved when things went wrong. The registered manager and provider had formed strong relationships with healthcare professionals and local health providers.