Updated 13 February 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection team consisted of one adult social care inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. The Expert by Experience made phone calls to people who used the service and their relatives.
Service and service type:
Dale Care Hartlepool is a domiciliary care agency which provides personal care to people living in their own homes. A registered manager was not in place during our visit, but the manager had applied to the Care Quality Commission to become the registered manager.
Notice of inspection:
We gave the service 48 hours' notice of the inspection visit because we needed to be sure the management would be in the office. Inspection site visit activity started on 19 December 2018 and ended on 9 January 2019. We visited the office location on all of the days of inspection to see the manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.
What we did:
Before the inspection we reviewed the information, we held about the service. This included the statutory notifications sent to us by the registered provider about incidents and events that had occurred at the service. A notification is information about important events which the service is required to send to us by law. We also contacted the commissioners of the service to gain their views.
The provider had completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and any improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan how the inspection should be conducted.
During the inspection site visit we spoke with the manager, the provider’s operations manager, the head of recruitment and HR, the marketing and communications manager, the scheme manager, five members of care staff and one of the directors who was the nominated individual. A nominated individual has overall responsibility for supervising the management of the regulated activity and ensuring the quality of the services provided. We looked at care records for seven people, medicine records for 15 people, recruitment records for two staff and other records relating to the management and quality monitoring of the service. We contacted 14 people and three relatives to gather their views about the care and support they received.