About the service Thera East Midlands provides care and support to people with a learning disability living in supported living accommodation. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting 297 people.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People were supported to be safe and protected from discrimination. Safety was a high priority for managers and staff, systems and processes to identify risk or potential abuse were robust. Peoples freedom was respected, and they were supported to be as independent as they could be.
There were enough staff with the right skill mix to meet people’s needs and support them to stay safe. People were supported to have their medicines at the right time in in the right way. Staff ensured people’s medicines were regularly reviewed to make sure they were still working effectively and that any benefits outweighed any side effects.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.
The service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture.
People were supported in in a person-centred way. The culture of the service was empowering and inclusive. Staff promoted people’s human rights and protected people’s privacy and dignity. People were consulted and included in decisions about their care and support and about the development of the service.
Staff knew how to communicate with people effectively and understood people’s needs well. People led active lives and were able to follow the hobbies and interests they enjoyed. Where possible people accessed learning and education. People liked the staff and had confidence in them.
There was a strong framework of accountability and systems to monitor the quality of the service were well embedded into the running of the service. There was a clear organisational structure and staff understood their responsibilities. People, staff and relatives told us managers were supportive, approachable and accessible. A relative said, “I am delighted with the care and if there any issues or if there’s something I am not happy with I will contact the registered manager.”
Performance management processes were effective, reviewed regularly, and reflected best practice. Managers provided feedback to staff and there was clear evidence this led to improvement and good outcomes for people.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was Good (published 30 May 2019).
Why we inspected
The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about the management of people’s medicines. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.
We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the ‘safe’ and ‘well led’ sections of this full report.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.