Updated 29 March 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type:
This service is a home care service, which provides personal care and support to children, younger adults and older people living in their own homes within the community. The service specialised in providing care to meet the needs of people who had experienced person injuries, including acquired brain and spinal cord injuries.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection site visit because we needed to be sure arrangements could be made to meet with key staff and people who use the service.
What we did:
Before the inspection we looked at information we held about the service:
• We asked the provider to complete a Provider Information Return. This is key information providers are required to send about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.
• The law requires providers to notify us of certain events that happen during the running of a service. We reviewed notifications received since the last inspection.
• We spoke with three health and social care professionals who work with the service.
During the inspection:
• Inspection site visit activity was carried out on 19 February 2019. We visited the office location on this date to see the provider and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.
• We spoke with the registered manager, two directors, the office manager, two care coordinators.
• On 25 February 2019, we completed a home visit, where we spoke with a person using the service, their relatives and care staff.
• Between 4 and 11 March 2019, we spoke with five people who use the service and seven case managers, who had been legally appointed to commission people’s care. In this context, case managers are health and social care professionals with expertise in the areas of support required by people, for example, spinal cord injuries.
• We spoke with 16 staff who supported people living in different parts of the United Kingdom.
• We looked at eight people’s care records, eight staff recruitment and training files, the provider’s policies, procedures, quality assurance systems processes and other records demonstrating how the service was managed.