Background to this inspection
Updated
26 April 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was carried out by two inspectors and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. This person had experience of caring for older persons.
Service and service type:
Blenheim Court Care Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
The inspection was unannounced.
What we did:
Before the inspection we reviewed information, we had received about the service. This included details about incidents the provider must notify us about, for example, injuries that occur in the service and any allegations of abuse. We assessed the information received in the Provider Information Return (PIR). This is information we require providers to send us at least annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
Some people using the service were not able to verbally express their views about the service. Therefore, we spent time observing interactions between staff and people within the communal areas of the home. We spoke to seven people, four visitors, 11 members of staff, the registered manager and regional manager. We looked at the care records for five people and the management of medicines in the home. We also looked at five staff recruitment records and sampled supervisions and training records for other staff. We also looked at records relating to the quality and management of the service.
Following the inspection, we requested further information, such as policies and procedures. We received everything we asked for.
Updated
26 April 2019
About the service: Blenheim Court Care Home is a care home which also provides nursing care to up to 60 older persons, some of whom live with dementia. At the end of August 2018, the company directors and senior managers changed. In December 2019 a new manager began working in this care home and became registered with CQC just before the inspection.
At the time of our inspection there were 22 people living in the home and although there were registered nurses on site, no one was in receipt of nursing care.
People’s experience of using this service:
• People told us they were happy with the service they received at Blenheim Court Care Home. They said they felt safe and that staff were kind, caring and respectful. A variety of activities were available although some people’s comments suggested they were not always satisfied with these. The registered manager had plans to further develop and enhance activity provision.
• Staffing levels met people’s needs and plans were in place to continue the recruitment and development of staffing. Staff felt supported in their roles and were given access to training that enabled them to provide effective care to people. Medicines were managed safely and people were supported by effective staff who understood their responsibility to keep people safe.
• Staff’s knowledge of people’s history, preferences and risks associated with their care and support needs was good. Staff respected and encouraged people to make their own decisions. However, care records required further development to ensure they provided accurate guidance to new or less familiar staff about people’s needs.
• Everyone had confidence in the registered manager and could tell us about things they felt had improved since the management changes had occurred.
• The management team were open and transparent. They understood their regulatory responsibility. No one had any complaints and felt the management team were open, approachable and supportive. Everyone was confident the provider would take the necessary actions to address any concerns promptly. Feedback about the management team demonstrated they listened and took any feedback as an opportunity to make improvements for people.
Rating at last inspection: This was the first inspection since the service became registered with CQC on 12 February 2018.
Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection in line with CQC’s inspection methodology to ensure the provider was meeting the requirements of the legislation.
Follow up: There is no required follow up to this inspection but we will continue to monitor all information received about the service, to understand any risks that may arise and to ensure the next inspection is scheduled accordingly.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk