Updated 19 July 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
The inspection was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice as we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 27 June 2019 and ended on 5 July 2019. We visited the office location on 27 July 2019.
What we did before the inspection
Before the inspection, we reviewed relevant information that we had about the service including any notifications of safeguarding or incidents affecting the safety and wellbeing of people. A notification is information about important events, which the provider is required to tell us about by law.
We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. A PIR is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what it does well and any improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.
We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
During the inspection we spoke by telephone with two people using the service and three relatives. We also spoke with the registered manager. We reviewed documents and records that related to people’s care and the management of the service. We reviewed three people’s care plans and three staff recruitment files. We also looked at staff training records, audits, safety checks of the premises, complaint records and accident and incident records.
After the inspection we spoke with two care staff by telephone.