• Dentist
  • Dentist

Putney Dental Surgery Ltd

353 Upper Richmond Road, Putney, London, SW15 5QJ (020) 8878 6329

Provided and run by:
Putney Dental Surgery Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

29 September 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a focused inspection of Putney Dental Surgery LTD on the 29 September 2017.

The inspection was carried out by a review of documents and other evidence sent to us from the provider as requested at our previous inspection.

At the previous comprehensive inspection we found the registered provider was providing safe, effective, caring and responsive, care in accordance with relevant regulations. We judged the practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with regulations 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Putney Dental Surgery LTD on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

We also reviewed the key question of safe as we had made recommendations for the provider relating to this key question. We noted that improvements had been made.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

12 December 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 12 December 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Putney Dental Practice, located in Putney, London provides NHS and private dental treatment to patients of all ages. The services provided include preventative advice and treatment and routine dental care.

The practice staffing consists of a principal dentist, two additional dentists, one dental nurse, one hygienist, a practice /registered manager and a receptionist/nurse.

The practice manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice consists of two treatment rooms, a decontamination room, a reception/waiting area for patients and a staff room/kitchen

The practice opening hours are Monday to Friday 9am to 6pm and Saturdays 9am to 2pm.

Patients we spoke with and those who were very positive about the care they received and about the service. Patients told us that they were happy with the dental treatment and advice they had received.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff had received safeguarding children and adults training and knew the processes to follow to raise any concerns. The practice had whistleblowing policies and procedure and staff were aware of these and their responsibilities to report any concerns.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and patient confidentiality was maintained.
  • Patients’ care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with current legislation and evidence based guidelines such as from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
  • There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
  • The practice had a procedure for handling and responding to complaints.
  • There were systems in place to ensure that equipment including the compressor, X-ray unit was maintained and PAT (portable appliance testing) had been carried out.
  • Staff had been trained to handle medical emergencies; however not all recommended medicines and life-saving equipment were readily available.
  • Infection control protocols were not being followed in line with recommended national guidance.
  • The practice had not ensured that all the specified information relating to persons employed at the practice was obtained and appropriately recorded.
  • Governance systems were not effective. The practice had not carried out audits in key areas, such as radiography and infection control.The practice had carried out limited risk assessments to safeguard the health and safety of staff and patients.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Ensure an effective system is established to assess, monitor and mitigate the various risks arising from undertaking of the regulated activities.

  • Ensure systems are in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality of the service. This could include for example undertaking regular audits of various aspects of the service and ensuring that where appropriate audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Ensure the practice's recruitment policy and procedures are suitable and the recruitment arrangements are in line with Schedule 3 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 to ensure necessary employment checks are in place for all staff and the required specified information in respect of persons employed by the practice is held.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review availability of medicines and equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team.
  • Review the practice's policy and the storage of products identified under Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) 2002 Regulations to ensure a risk assessment is undertaken and the products are stored securely.

  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’
  • Review stocks of medicines and equipment and the system for identifying and disposing of out-of-date stock.
  • Review staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role.
  • Review the staff supervision protocols and ensure an effective process is established for the on-going appraisal of all staff.

28 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people using the service and also reviewed feedback forms. People told us "I don't feel rushed into making a decision" and "I read and signed my treatment plan". They said they were happy with the service provided and that they would recommend the dentist to others.

Staff were aware of the importance of gaining consent from patients before commencing treatment. We saw records that showed where treatment was required an individual treatment plan including costs was provided and written consent was obtained from the patient.

The practice held detailed, computerised records related to each patient which contained their treatment options and their clinical notes. Medical histories and signed copies of treatment plans and consent forms were kept in paper format.

We observed staff as they demonstrated the procedure they used to clean dirty instruments and found they followed the accepted processes correctly. There were protocols in place for cleaning within the practice and staff confirmed each treatment room was cleaned in the morning, in between patients and at the end of the day. We saw that staff completed a daily infection prevention checklist.

We looked at the training records of staff at the practice. These included evidence of training and current General Dental Council (GDC) certificates.

We found that regular audits had been undertaken at the practice, these included infection control and clinical record keeping.