Updated 4 June 2019
The inspection :
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection visit was conducted by one inspector. In addition to the visit to the office, we contacted people using the service, their representatives and staff to ask for their feedback and experiences. Telephone calls to people using the service and their relatives were made by an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type:
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to older adults and younger disabled adults.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small, and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.
Telephone calls to people who used the service and their relatives took place on 19 March 2019. We visited the office location on 27 March 2019 to see the manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.
What we did:
Before the inspection we looked at all the information we held about the provider and also public information from the provider's own, and other, websites. We contacted the local authority commissioners to ask for their views of the service.
We spoke with five people who used the service and four relatives of other people.
During the visit to the office location we met the registered manager (also the owner of the company), the care coordinator and two care assistants . We also received additional feedback from a third care assistant by email. We looked at the care records for four people who used the service, four staff files, records of staff training and meeting minutes, information about medicines management, records of complaints, incidents and accidents and the provider's quality assurance records.
At the end of the inspection we gave feedback about our findings to the registered manager.
Following the inspection visit we spoke with one external professional who supported one person using the service.