People who used the service understood the care and treatment choices available to them. We saw that staff dealt with people in a polite and friendly way. People told us that the doctor was good at explaining different types of treatment options. One person told us, 'the doctor is brilliant, he will listen to me and then explain things'. We found that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. Care plans we looked at were person centred and were developed around individual needs. People we spoke with were positive about the surgery. One person told us, 'I don't think that they could really improve, I am more than happy'. Another person said, 'the doctor is very good'.
People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening. People told us that they felt safe at the surgery and felt comfortable with reporting any concerns they had to staff.
There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place. Prospective staff were interviewed by the GP to ensure that they had the suitable skills and experience for the particular role. We saw that the practice carried out employment checks to verify qualifications, references and identity.
People who used the service, their representatives and staff were asked for their views about their care and treatment and they were acted on. We saw that learning from incidents, complaints and investigations took place and appropriate changes were implemented. We examined a number of recent 'significant events' that had been recorded by the practice. We spoke to the practice manager about one of them. They explained what had happened and how the surgery had changed its practice to prevent the same situation arising in the future.