Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Binfield Road Surgery on 7 March 2017. The practice was rated good overall and requires improvement for providing services that were safe. The full comprehensive report from the March 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Binfield Road Surgery Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced desk-based review carried out on 23 October 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the recommendations we made in our previous inspection on 7 March 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those recommendations made at our last inspection.
At our previous inspection undertaken on 7 March 2017, we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services as:
-
Two members of staff were acting as chaperones without having had a DBS check undertaken prior to employment.
-
The fire risk assessment did not provide a comprehensive assessment of fire risks in the practice.
In addition to the breaches of regulation we identified we also suggested areas where the provider should make improvements including:
-
Take steps to make the practice complaints procedure easily accessible to patients and provide formal written response to written complaints.
-
Review systems for the storage and monitoring of Patient Group Directions (PGD).
The practice is now rated as good for the key question: Are services safe?
Our key findings were as follows:
-
All staff had received a DBS check and a practice policy had been drafted which required all staff who undertook the chaperoning role to have a DBS check. In addition their recruitment policy had been updated to refer to the new DBS policy.
-
The practice had updated their internal fire risk assessment using Health and Safety Executive guidelines.
In addition:
-
The practice provided us with a complaint log of recent complaints although this did not indicate that formal written responses were sent to patients when they complained in writing. The practice provided a copy of the complaint poster used to advertise the complaints policy.
-
The practice provided copy of their PGD policy which placed the responsibility for ensuring PGDs were valid on the individual practitioner with signed copies of these being kept by the practice.
-
The practice provided an example of a recent significant event which demonstrated learning and action taken.
-
The practice continued to minute multidisciplinary discussions in patient records and kept a log of the patients discussed in each meeting in an effort to reduce the administrative burden on clinical staff.
No further action had been taken to assess whether there had been any improve patient satisfaction with appointment waiting times. The period where data had been collected for the most recent national GP patient survey results pre dated the action the practice had taken to improve satisfaction with waiting times.
Areas where the practice should make improvement:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice