• Doctor
  • GP practice

Pavilion Surgery Also known as Dr Gilhooly and Partners

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2-3 Old Steine, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 1EJ (01273) 685588

Provided and run by:
Pavilion Surgery

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

The practice was rated good overall and is now rated good for providing safe services.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 27 May 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found during that inspection within the safe domain. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice sent us an action plan detailing what they would do to meet the legal requirements. We conducted a desk based focused inspection on 13 May 2016 to check that the provider had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. (A desk based focused inspection means the provider was able to send us evidence of the action taken to address the issues previously found rather than visiting the practice).

During our previous inspection on 27 May 2015 we found the following areas where the practice must improve:-

  • Ensure that a legionella inspection is carried out.

  • Ensure that all clinical staff have been checked with the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) prior to them commencing in post.

Our previous report also highlighted areas where the practice should improve:-

  • Ensure that meeting minutes include details of which staff were present and a summary of discussions held to include actions to be taken and by whom.

  • Support the patient participation group (PPG) to gather and review patient feedback on the practice and ensure this is recorded so that the practice demonstrates on-going learning from patient feedback and involvement.

  • Ensure that identified health and safety risks are recorded in a way that details the actions to be taken to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

During this inspection we found:

  • The practice had conducted a legionella inspection and completed the necessary works to ensure safety.

  • All clinical staff had received a criminal record check via the DBS and the practice had a policy to ensure that new clinical staff received a DBS check prior to them commencing in post.

We also found in relation to the areas where the practice should improve:

  • That the practice was able to provide evidence that meeting minutes included details of which staff were present and a summary of discussions held which included actions taken.

  • The practice was able to provide evidence that they had supported the PPG to gather and review patient feedback on the practice and that this information was recorded and published on the practice website.

  • The practice was able to demonstrate that identified health and safety risks were recorded in a way that detailed the actions to be taken to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of people with long term conditions. At our  inspection in May 2015 the provider was  rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which  led to these  ratings applied to everyone using the  practice,  including this  population group. As following this  inspection the  practice is  now rated as good for safety, this population group is  now also  rated as good.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of families, children and young people. At our  inspection in May 2015 the provider was rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which led to these  ratings applied to everyone using the  practice, including this  population group. As following this  inspection the practice is  now rated as good for safety, this population group is now also  rated as good.

Older people

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of older people. At our inspection in May 2015 the provider was rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which led to these  ratings applied to everyone using the  practice, including this  population group. As following this  inspection the practice is  now rated as good for safety, this population group is now also  rated as good.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of working age people (including those recently retired and students). At our  inspection in May 2015 the provider was rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which led to these  ratings applied to everyone using the  practice, including this  population group. As following this  inspection the practice is  now rated as good for safety, this population group is now also  rated as good.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). At our  inspection in May 2015 the provider was rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which led to these r atings applied to everyone using the  practice, including this  population group. As following this inspection the practice is now rated as good for safety, this population group is also  rated as good.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 26 July 2016

The practice is rated good for the care of people whose circumstances make them vulnerable. At our  inspection in May 2015 the provider was rated as requires  improvement for safety. The  concerns which led to these  ratings applied to everyone using the  practice, including this  population group. As following this  inspection the practice is  now rated as good for safety, this population group is now also  rated as good.