25 February 2022
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection at The College Practice, Maidstone, Kent, on 25 February 2022 in response to information of concern we received regarding access to the practice.
Overall, the practice remains rated as Good and the rating for the responsive key question remains Good.
Following our previous inspection on 18 January 2017, the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions. The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The College Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
How we carried out the inspection
Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included:
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A short site visit.
This inspection was part triggered as a result of a piece of work Care Quality Commission (CQC) was undertaking around the urgent and emergency care integrated pathway for patients in Kent and Medway. To understand the experience of GP providers and people who use GP services, we asked a range of questions in relation to urgent and emergency care. The responses we received have been used to inform and support system wide feedback.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as Good overall
We found that:
- The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs effectively.
- Patients were positive about treatment and caring nature of the staff. We received mixed feedback about online service provision and prescription issues. Although patients were able to access the treatment concerns were raised about telephone access and the provider was addressing these. Throughout the inspection, we saw evidence that the practice had taken action to improve access to services. There was an action plan under continuous review for all areas of improvement, with a particular focus on how patients accessed the practice.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care