7 December 2023
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection at Alexandra Medical Centre on 7 December 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as good.
Safe – good
Effective - good
Caring – rating of good carried forward from previous inspection.
Responsive - good
Well-led – good
Following our previous inspection on 6 August 2015 the practice was rated good overall.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Alexandra Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities.
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- Safeguarding systems were in place and staff demonstrated a clear understanding of the reporting and recording processes.
- We found the premises were well maintained, appeared visibly clean and tidy and there were appropriate infection prevention and control arrangements in place.
- There was a system in place to manage safety alerts, however this required strengthening to ensure historical alerts were revisited and accurately coded on the system.
- Structures, processes, and systems to support good governance were in place, however we identified gaps in mandatory training which required further oversight.
- Where we identified gaps in systems and processes, the practice responded in a timely manner to reduce risks to patients and staff.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
- Patient feedback through the National Patient Survey was positive in relation to access and the provision of care.
- There was a strong emphasis of working with partners to tackle health inequalities.
- The practice provided a supportive culture with clear direction for the future of the service.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Take action to increase the uptake of cervical screening.
- Take action to review and accurately code safety alerts.
- Improve the system in place to review patients with long term conditions who are due for monitoring checks.
- Take action to complete mandatory training requirements.
- Take action to ensure patient records are accurate, complete and contemporaneous.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care