3 July 2019
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Clay Cross Medical Centre on 3 July 2018. The overall rating for the practice was ‘good’, however, the practice was rated as ‘requires improvement’ for providing effective services. This was because:
- The practice’s achievement for the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) had reduced by approximately 20% from the previous year’s performance.
- Annual health reviews had only been completed for approximately half of the patients included on the practice’s learning disability register.
- Records of meetings did not always provide clear evidence of discussions having taken place on new guidance, complaints and significant events.
- The prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics was higher than local and national average percentages.
The practice was asked to develop an action plan to address the areas of concern that were identified during our inspection.
The full comprehensive report and evidence table can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Clay Cross Medical Centre on our website at
This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 3 July 2019 to review the actions taken by the practice since our previous inspection in July 2018. This report covers our findings in relation to actions taken by the practice since our last inspection.
Overall the practice remains rated as ‘good’. The practice is now also rated ‘good’ for providing effective services. All population groups are now rated as good with the exception of ‘people with long-term conditions’ which remains as ‘requires improvement’ as further work is required to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes.
Our key findings were as follows:
- The practice had improved its overall QOF performance from 78.8% in 2017-18, to 94% in 2018-19. These figures remain subject to external verification.
- Whilst there had been good improvement for QOF achievement across the clinical domains, there was further work needed to maximise outcomes within indicators relating to diabetes. The practice was aware of this and had a clear plan in place to try and address this.
- The practice was monitoring antibiotic prescribing by regular audits and were taking action to ensure prescribing was undertaken in line with guidance.
- The practice had identified more carers since our previous inspection and had systems in place to advise and support them appropriately.
- Minutes from meetings were comprehensive and provided clear evidence that topics (for example, new guidance) were discussed and acted upon.
- Evidence of the immunisation status of staff was available.
- The uptake of annual health reviews for patients with a learning disability had increased.
There was one area in which the provider should continue to make improvements:
- Continue with plans to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care