Hathaway Medical Partnership Also known as Hathaway Medical Centre

We carried out an announced focussed inspection at Hathaway Medical Partnership on 15 January 2020 following our annual review of the information available to us which indicated that there may have been a significant change (either deterioration or improvement) to the quality of care provided since the last inspection in September 2016.

This inspection focused on the following key questions:

• Are services effective?
• Are services responsive?
• Are services well led?

Because of the assurance received from our review of information, we carried forward the ratings for the following key questions:

• Are services safe? (Good)
• Are services caring? (Good)

At our last inspection in September 2016, although there were no breaches in regulations, we noted that there were areas in which the practice should make improvements. At this inspection, we saw evidence that these areas had been addressed and improvements made.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

• what we found when we inspected
• information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
• information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for the population groups containing people with long-term conditions, working age people (including those recently retired and students) and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) and for providing effective services because:

• Although the practice performed well in many benchmarking results (QOF), we found that there was high exception reporting and low achievement figures in the population groups affecting people with long-term conditions, working age people (including those recently retired and students) and people experiencing poor mental health. In relation to these, the practice was unable to fully demonstrate that enough improvements had been made.

We have rated this practice as good overall, good for providing responsive and well led services and good for the population groups containing older people and families, children and young people and people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable because:

• Patients’ needs were assessed, and care and treatment was delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance supported by clear pathways and tools.
• The practice had a comprehensive programme of quality improvement activity and routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care provided.
• Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care, support and treatment.
• Staff worked together and with other organisations to deliver effective care and treatment.
• There was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership at all levels. This included working with and supporting the PPG.
• The practice had a clear vision and set of values that prioritised quality and sustainability.
• The practice had a culture that drove high quality sustainable care.
• There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance and management.
• There were clear and effective processes for managing risks, issues and performance.

Although we did not find any beaches of regulation on this inspection, we did see areas where the provider should make improvements. These are:

• Continue to monitor exception reporting rates to ensure they are applied accurately and in line with guidance.
• Continue improving the uptake of dementia reviews.
• Continue to review arrangements to improve the uptake of cervical screening.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care