22 January 2024
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out a targeted assessment of Manor Farm Medical Centre on 22 January 2024 without a site visit. Overall, the practice is rated as good. We rated the key question of responsive as requires improvement.
Safe –good – carried forward from previous inspection
Effective – good – carried forward from previous inspection
Caring – good – carried forward from previous inspection
Responsive – requires improvement
Well led – good – carried forward from previous inspection
Following our previous inspection in November 2022, the practice was rated good for safe, effective, good and well led and requires improvement for responsive. At this inspection, we rated the practice requires improvement for providing responsive services.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Manor Farm Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this assessment as part of our work to understand how practices are working to try to meet demand for access and to better understand the experiences of people who use services and providers.
How we carried out the review
This assessment was carried out remotely. It did not include a site visit.
The process included:
- Conducting an interview with the provider and members of staff using video conferencing.
- Reviewing patient feedback from a range of sources
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- Reviewing data we hold about the service
- Seeking information/feedback from relevant stakeholders
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- The practice had increased patient satisfaction for telephone access in the national GP patient survey since the 2023 national GP patient survey results.
- The provider responded to patient feedback about telephone answering with the introduction of a new phone system. This had reduced telephony waiting times.
- Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual people and were delivered in a way to ensure continuity of care.
- The provider had implemented a sit and wait service twice daily that patients uptake had increased by over 50%.
- We found that patients individual needs and preferences were central to the delivery of services.
- Patients could not always access care and treatment in a timely way and appointments were accessible in a way that suited a patient’s individual need.
- There was a dedicated team for learning disability patients for health reviews and patient consultations available.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care