19 October 2022
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced comprehensive at Guildhall Surgery on 19 October 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as good.
We rated the following key questions as:
Safe - Good
Effective - Good
Caring - Good
Responsive - Good
Well-led - Requires improvement
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection to follow up breaches of regulation from a previous inspection.
Following our previous inspection on 25 February 2022 the practice was rated inadequate overall with a rating of inadequate for providing safe and well-led services. The practice was rated as requires improvement for providing effective services. As a result of the concerns identified, we issued two warning notices for breaches of Regulation 12: Safe care and treatment and Regulation 17: Good governance. We also issued two requirement notices for breaches of Regulation 13: Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment and Regulation 19: Fit and proper persons employed. The practice was placed into special measures.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Guildhall Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing facilities.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- Safeguarding processes had been reviewed and updated to operate more effectively and staff were trained to appropriate levels for their role.
- The practice had improved their oversight of test results and these were now reviewed in a timely manner.
- The practice had made improvements to its authorisations to administer medicines by Patient Group Directions.
- The practice had improved the process for monitoring patients’ health in relation to the use of high-risk medicines.
- The practice had reviewed the system to record, monitor and share learning from significant events.
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- The practice had improved their systems and processes to keep clinicians up to date with current evidence-based practice.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The practice had a clear vision and credible strategy to provide high quality sustainable care.
- Some of the systems and processes to support good governance and management were not operated effectively. In particular, the system in place for the summarisation of new patient notes was not effective, complaints responses did not consistently provide details of how to take further action if patients were not satisfied with the response and the practice had not ensured non-clinical staff vaccinations were held in line with national guidance.
We found a breach of regulations. The provider must:
- Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
In addition, the provider should:
- Continue to improve the uptake of childhood immunisations.
- Continue to improve the uptake of cervical screening.
- Continue to take action to address patient feedback and improve access to the service.
I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements that have been made to the quality of care provided by this service.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services