• Doctor
  • GP practice

Paston Health Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Chadburn, Paston, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE4 7DG (01733) 572584

Provided and run by:
Paston Health Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Paston Health Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Paston Health Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

04/02/2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a focused inspection at Paston Health Centre on 4 February 2020. The announced inspection was part of our inspection programme. Following a Care Quality Commission annual regulatory review to check for changes in quality we inspected the effective and well-led domains. We used information from our previous inspection findings for the safe, caring and responsive domains.

This inspection focused on the following key questions:

  • are services effective?
  • are services well-led?

Because of the assurance received from our review of information we carried forward the ratings for the following key questions:

  • are services safe? - good
  • are services caring? - good
  • are services responsive? – good

At the last inspection on 4 November 2015 we rated the practice as good overall. The full comprehensive report for this inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Paston Health Centre on our website at .

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • What we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall.

We rated the population groups older people, people with long-term conditions, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) as good.

We rated the population group families, children and young people as requires improvement because:

  • Uptake rates for childhood immunisations were lower than the World Health Organisation (WHO) standard of 95% of children to receive recommended vaccinations.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Take action to review and improve the approach taken in encouraging the uptake of childhood immunisations and cervical screening for eligible women.
  • Take action on developing structured care plans for older patients with complex needs.
  • Act to ensure non-attenders for reviews are offered opportunistic reviews.
  • Take action establishing a rolling program of clinical and location based quality improvement activity.
  • Take action on developing the virtual Patient Participation Group.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care.

4 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Werrington Health Centre on 4 November 2015. The practice provides primary medical services to approximately 13,750 patients who live in the surrounding area. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all of the areas inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report and follow through incidents and near misses. Opportunities for learning from incidents were shared with staff during meetings and action taken to prevent similar recurrences but these were not recorded. Staff had the knowledge and skills to enable them to take appropriate action if they had concerns about patient’s safety.
  • Practice staff utilised methods to improve patient outcomes by working with other local providers to share best practice. Clinical staff used the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines when assessing patients and for their care needs.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. Information was provided to help patients understand the services available to them. Patients we spoke with told us they received good standards of care.
  • Practice staff worked closely with other organisations and external professionals in planning how services were provided to ensure that they meet people’s needs. People with complex needs had care plans and risk assessments in place that were regularly reviewed.
  • Practice staff relied on the NHS patient surveys to identify where improvements could be made. They did not have a Patient Participation Group (PPG) but were encouraging patients to join. (PPG’s work with practice staff in an effective way that may lead to improved services).
  • Senior staff had a clear vision which had quality, safety and patient care as its priority. Plans for the future were in place to further extend the hours when patients could access the service at weekends. There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. It was evident that there was a strongly motivated staff team.

We saw an area of outstanding practice:

  • The dedicated carer’s notice board provided information about support groups, guidance on what constitutes a carer and a request to inform staff if they were a carer. Last year practice staff established the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Carers Surgery. Weekly coffee, lunch clubs and drop-in sessions were commenced at the practice premises. Regular presentations were given to provide carers with support and guidance. In January 2015 the practice was awarded a Carers Surgery of the Month certificate. The practice manager told us they were organising the 2016 meetings and planned to increase the advertising to promote attendances. We were told that so far, the Carers Surgery had facilitated networking between carers as well as providing guidance and support for them.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

In addition the provider should:

  • Consider ways to engage with patients in order to develop a Patient Participation Group (PPG).
  • Produce minutes of practice meetings to confirm that the outcomes and actions from significant events and complaints are shared with all staff and lessons learnt are monitored.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

4 November 2015

During an inspection of this service