Shevington Surgery

Updated 27 December 2018

Shevington Surgery is the registered provider and provides primary care services to its registered list of 12,653 patients.

The practice is situated in an area at number nine on the deprivation scale (the scale is between one and ten; the lower the number, the higher the deprivation).

There are eight GP partners, four male and four female. There is one advanced nurse practitioner, seven practice nurses of which three have a prescribing qualification, two healthcare assistants, a practice manager, and reception and administrative staff.

Normal opening hours are Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 8am - 8pm, Wednesday and Friday 8am - 6.30pm and Saturdays 8am -12 noon. Appointments are available with GPs and nurses daily.

The GMS contract is the contract between general practices and NHS England for delivering primary care services to local communities. The practice is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide the regulated activities of diagnostic and screening procedures; family planning: surgical procedures; maternity and midwifery services and treatment of disease, disorder and injury. The practice is teaching practice for medical students and also provides nurse training.

Regulated activities are delivered to the patient population from the following address:

The Surgery

Houghton Lane

Shevington

Wigan

Lancs

WN6 8ET

www.shevington-surgery.co.uk

Updated 27 December 2018

This practice is rated as Outstanding overall. (Previous rating October 2014 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Outstanding

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Outstanding

At this inspection we found:

• There was an open culture in which all safety concerns raised by staff and people who used the service were highly valued and integrated into learning with improvements made. Some of these learnings were shared with peers and local Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG).

• Throughout our inspection there was a strong theme of bespoke education and training programmes which had been developed to maintain safe processes and align with the practice’s in-house processes, being a clear link between a clinical need and the training delivered. These were overseen and maintained by all the clinical staff.

• The practice had a clear vision which had holistic care, quality and safety as its top priority. The strategy to deliver this vision had been produced with stakeholders and was regularly reviewed and discussed with all staff.

• The practice had clearly defined and bespoke embedded systems, processes and practices in place to keep staff and patients safe.

• The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines at their practice educational meetings.

• The practice had strong and visible clinical and managerial leadership and governance arrangements.

• The practice had identified a high number of carers and one of these was also documented as a child carer.

• The practice had a highly active Patient Participation Group (PPG), who ran various carer groups for patients and local community,

• Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice:

• One significant incident involved a violent and threating patient, which saw the practice being locked down until the police arrived. Part of the practice system for analysing significant event, it was identified the need for a lock down policy and learning was identified. The practice fitted CCTV and a panic alarm connected to the police. The practice manager worked closely with the CCG and other practice managers who set up a working group to develop a policy for locking down a practice, shared and rolled out to all practices in the Borough.

• We saw 100% of patients at end of life having had a preferred place of death recorded. Where Do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders were in place we saw patients had been involved in and agreed with this decision. The practice had also audited if they had achieved the patient’s wishes and identified these wishes had been achieved 71%. The practice also designed an End of life grab bag for clinicians.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

Updated 27 December 2018

Updated 27 December 2018

Updated 27 December 2018

Updated 27 December 2018

Updated 27 December 2018

Updated 27 December 2018