- GP practice
Archived: Darwin Medical Practice
Important:
This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
All Inspections
18/02/2019
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Darwin Medical Practice on 18 February 2019 as part of our inspection programme.
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Formalise reviews with nurse practitioners.
- Complete the planned changes to the complaints process.
- Continue to develop an oversight tool for the alert process.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice
22 February 2016
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Spires Practice on 22 February 2016. Overall the practice is rated as Good.
Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) at that time.
Our key findings were as follows:
- Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, reviewed and addressed.
- Risks of infection had not been completed in some treatment rooms.
- Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
- Patients said they were treated with dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
- Patients told us they could get an appointment when they needed one. Urgent appointments were available the same day.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff understood their roles and responsibilities.
We saw a number of areas where the practice should make improvements.
The practice should:
-
Perform a risk assessment on the use of handwashing sinks in clinical rooms with screw top taps. Complete and maintain a risk log for the premises.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice