26 September 2017
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Crawford Street Surgery on 11 February 2016. The practice was rated as good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services, and requires improvement for providing safe services. Overall the practice was rated as good. The full comprehensive report on the February 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Crawford Street Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced comprehensive follow up inspection on 26 September 2017 to check for improvements since our previous inspection. The practice is now rated as requires improvement for providing effective and caring services, and good for providing safe, responsive and well-led services. Overall the practice is now rated as requires improvement.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
- Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to checking uncollected repeat prescriptions and the monitoring of patients taking azathioprine.
- Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
- Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework showed patient outcomes were below average compared to the national average.
- There was evidence of quality improvement activity including clinical audit.
- Results from the national GP patient survey 2017 showed patients rated the practice below average for satisfaction scores on consultations with the GPs and for several other aspects of care.
- Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
- Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.
Importantly, the provider must:
-
Ensure that all patients’ needs are identified and care and treatment meets their needs.
The provider should:
- Review the systems for monitoring patients on high risk medicines, and checking uncollected blank prescriptions.
- Consider ways to improve performance against national screening programmes.
- Review ways to improve patient satisfaction with consultations, and the availability and punctuality of appointments.
- Continue to identify and support patients who are carers.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice