We carried out an announced inspection at Park Health Care Centre (also known as DELTA Healthcare) on 06 and 08 December. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.
Safe - Good
Effective - Good
Well Led - Good
Following our previous inspection on 07 August 2019, the practice was rated Requires Improvement overall and for the key questions of safe and effective but rated Good for caring, responsive, and well led.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Park Health Care Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
This inspection was a follow-up inspection to follow up on:
- Safe and effective care
- Recommendations made at the last inspection, including:
- Improving the monitoring of blank prescriptions in the practice
- Improving the monitoring of patients receiving high risk medicines
- Improving the process for recruitment
- Ensuring staff receive safeguarding training appropriate to their level of responsibility
- Ensuring all staff received training appropriate training to the level and skill that is required to perform their role
- Improving the process for responding to complaints
- Improving the monitoring of safety alerts
- Continuing to monitor and improve care and treatment for patients as planned and provide regular reviews and assessment of needs in line with evidence-based guidance
How we carried out the inspection
Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
- Requesting evidence from the provider
- A short site visit
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as Good overall
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs, although there were some areas which could be improved.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Add more detail to the documentation of significant events so that it is clear what action has been taken, by whom, and when.
- Document clinical reasoning more thoroughly in the patient notes so it is clear what courses of treatment are being given to each patient and the reason why patient treatment may deviate from recommendations (for example, clearly stating why patients have not had recommended blood tests).
- Ensure documentation around staff training is complete so any gaps can be addressed.
- Consider an audit of patient reasons for non-attendance for cervical screening and immunisation in order to continue to improve these rates.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care