15 November 2023
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced comprehensive at Dr K Parkinson and Dr J.A. Gilby on 15 November 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as good. We rated the key questions:
Safe - good
Effective - good
Caring - good
Responsive - good
Well-led - good
Following our previous inspection on 17 January 2016, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr K Parkinson and Dr J.A. Gilby on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities.
The focus of the inspection included:
- The safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led domains.
- The ‘shoulds’ identified in previous inspection.
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A site visit.
- Staff questionnaires
- Information provided to the Care Quality Commission by other stakeholders, such as patient feedback, Healthwatch and the local Integrated Care Board.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Review and action our clinical searches in respect of the potential for missed diagnoses of diabetes.
- Implement a strategy to improve cervical screening uptake.
- Consider implementing in house appraisals for salaried GPs.
- Continue to assess, review, evaluate and embed changes made in response to patient feedback on access.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care