Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Kings Edge Medical Centre on 19 February 2016 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The practice was rated inadequate for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services and was placed into special measures for a period of six months. Due to serious concerns about patient safety we served a Section 31 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 notice to suspend the registration of the provider for a period of three months from 23 February 2016.
We then carried out a focused follow up inspection on 17 May 2016 to assess whether sufficient improvements had been made to allow the practice to re-open or if further enforcement action was required.
Following the inspection in May 2016 we found some improvements had been made however we still had concerns about the ability of the leadership to deliver high quality care. As a result we served a Section 31 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 notice to impose additional conditions on the registration of the provider in respect of the regulated activities for a period of three months. The additional conditions were that Kings Edge Medical Centre could not register any new patients apart from new born babies, newly fostered or adopted children to patients already registered with the practice.
The full reports on the February and May 2016 inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Kings Edge Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
We undertook a further announced comprehensive inspection of Kings Edge Medical Centre on 07 February 2017. This inspection was carried out following the period of special measures to ensure improvements had been made and to assess whether the practice could come out of special measures. Overall the practice is now rated as requires improvement.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
- Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
- Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
- Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Data from the national GP patient survey showed patients rated the practice lower than others for most aspects of care.
- Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
- The practice had adequate facilities and was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
- Clinical leadership arrangements were only formalised at the time of the inspection and therefore we were not assured that the improvements to date would be sustained.
The provider must:
- Monitor progress against plans to improve the quality and safety of services, and take appropriate action without delay where progress is not achieved as expected.
In addition the provider should:
- Continue to improve patient satisfaction with the service in response to feedback.
- Identify and support more patients who are also carers.
- Encourage more patients to attend the national bowel and breast cancer screening programme.
I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by this service.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice