This practice is rated as Good overall. (February 2016 – Good)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? - Good
In 2016, we carried out a focused inspection to review the actions taken by the provider as a result of our issuing one legal requirement at the previous comprehensive inspection. The practice had introduced systems to mitigate risk by improved reporting and investigation of incidents involving medicines.
At this inspection in May 2018, we found:
- The practice had embedded and introduced new systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
- The practice had implemented an IT system, which searched patient records to prompt audit and target regular reviews of patients to reduce health risks for them.
- Effectiveness and appropriateness of patient care was closely monitored by the strengthened governance arrangements put in place since the last inspection. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
- Feedback from all 30 patients at the inspection was strongly positive, and verified staff involved treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
- Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it. Patients needing urgent appointments were seen rapidly by the duty GP on the same day. Routine appointments for both GPs and nurses were available within two day.
- There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation. The practice had recommenced providing teaching placements for medical students.
- The practice had a strong focus on continuity of care with personal GP lists.