This service is rated as Good overall. (Not previously inspected by CQC.)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? Good
Are services well-led? – Good
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Travel Klinix on 29 November 2019 as part of our inspection programme to rate independent health providers.
Travel Klinix is an independent provider of general medical services to adults and children based in the Earlsdon district of Coventry. The service provides travel vaccinations, a range of general children’s and adult’s vaccinations (for example, shingles and flu) and health advice and treatment before and after travel abroad.
This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Travel Klinix services are provided to patients under arrangements made by their employer or a government department or an insurance company with whom the service user holds a policy (other than a standard health insurance policy). These types of arrangements are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, at Travel Klinix we were only able to inspect the services which are not arranged for patients by their employers or a government department or an insurance company with whom the patient holds a policy (other than a standard health insurance policy).
The director is the registered manager and doctor for the service. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
As part of our inspection we asked for Care Quality Commission comment cards to be completed by patients prior to our inspection. We received 100 comment cards, which were all very complimentary about the standard of service delivery, which was said to be excellent. The doctor, nurse and staff were praised for their caring, efficient and professional approach and patients appreciated the ease with which they could make appointments, often on the same day.
Our key findings were:
- The duration of appointments was timed according to the service or treatment provided.
- There was evidence of quality assurance activities to monitor the quality of services provided. Clinical audits were carried out and procedures and processes were regularly examined in conjunction with patient feedback and improvements were made when identified.
- There was an infection prevention and control (IPC) policy and an IPC audit had been carried out in the last 12 months.
- There were systems for the management of medicines and vaccinations.
- Staff showed awareness of current evidence based guidance and had received up to date training to enable them to deliver effective care and treatment.
- There was a clear leadership structure. Staff told us that they felt supported by the management team.
- Information about how to make a complaint was available.
- Services and fees were clearly displayed.
- The service proactively encouraged feedback from staff and patients and acted on the results.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care