About the serviceBonhomie House provides nursing and personal care for up to 78 people who may be living with dementia, have complex mental health needs or a disability.
People’s experience of using this service
The provider did not have effective oversight to consistently drive improvement. Systems and processes were not always effective to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.
The provider failed to ensure the decision to use CCTV had been appropriately assessed and documented in line with the code of practice set out by the Surveillance Camera Commissioner (SCC). We recommend the provider seek guidance from the Surveillance Camera Commissioner to ensure people's human rights were respected and protected.
The maintenance and cleanliness of the building required improvement to ensure good infection control procedures were being followed.
Medicines were not always being managed safely.
Records relating to end of life care did not consistently document people's wishes and preferences.
Staff had received safeguarding training and had their competency in this subject checked. They were aware of the types of abuse that could happen to people, what signs to look out for and their responsibilities for reporting any concerns.
The registered manager had a good understanding of their responsibilities to notify the CQC of important events that happened within the service. People and their families had been given information so that they knew what to expect from the service.
Staff received an appropriate induction into their role and learning opportunities were made available.
Most staff said they felt supported in their role. They told us they received regular supervision and appraisal.
Staffing levels met the needs of the people using the service. Staff had been recruited safely.
People were supported to have choice and control of their lives.
People had good access to healthcare services.
People, their families and other professionals had been involved in an assessment before the service provided any support. The assessment had been used to create care and support plans that addressed people’s individual identified needs. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of the actions they needed to take to support people.
A complaints procedure was in place and people told us they were confident that concerns would be dealt with appropriately by management.
Staff were supported and encouraged to share ideas about how the service could be improved and had been pro-active in supporting changes. Most staff spoke enthusiastically about the positive teamwork and support they received.
Why we inspected
This service was registered with us on 11 January 2019 and this is the first comprehensive inspection.
Enforcement and Recommendations
We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.
We have identified a breach of Regulation 17 (Good governance) at this inspection. The provider failed to ensure governance systems consistently drove improvement.
Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk