30 March and 12 April 2023
During a routine inspection
This was the first time we rated this service. We rated it as good because:
- The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients.
- Staff provided good care and treatment. The service monitored response times. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients. Services were available 7 days a week.
- Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
- The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it.
- Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged with patients to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services.
However:
- There was no formal eligibility criteria and no formal process for staff to follow in the event of them being unable to facilitate a journey.
- There was no formal vision and strategy for the service.
- Management meetings were not documented.
- The service did not have a robust process in place to monitor the overall outcome of audits and the completion of audit actions.