Background to this inspection
Updated
17 December 2020
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.
Inspection team
This inspection was carried out by two inspectors and an assistant inspector.
Service and service type
Reuben Manor is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 24 hours' notice of the inspection. This was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and we wanted to make sure the manager of the service could support the inspection.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed the information we held about the service such as when the provider told us about serious injuries or events.
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
We sought feedback from the local authority contracts monitoring and safeguarding adults' teams and reviewed the information they provided. We contacted the NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), who commission services from the provider, and the local Healthwatch for their feedback. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection-
We reviewed documentation, inspected the safety of the premises, the arrangements for infection prevention and control, and carried out observations in communal areas. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.
We spoke with three people living at the service, six relatives and seven members of staff including the registered manager and care staff.
We reviewed the care records for three people, the medicine records for nine people and the recruitment records for two staff. We looked at a range of records.
After the inspection
We continued to review records from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data, premises information, staffing rotas, meeting minutes and information relating to the governance of the service.
Updated
17 December 2020
About the service
Reuben Manor is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to 50 people at the time of inspection, some of whom were living with a dementia. The service can support up to 83 people in one large adapted building.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People and their relatives were very happy with the care provided from staff. One relative told us about the support staff had provided to two people and their wider family whilst delivering end of life care. Their comments included, “The staff were just exceptional” and, “[person] is cared for beyond anything we could possibly hope for.”
Medicines were managed safely, and the service had improved the processes for monitoring the administration of medicines. Care records were accurate and reflected the needs of people. Risk assessments were in place to help keep people safe.
Staff followed infection prevention and control policies. Due to the pandemic, additional processes and steps were taken by staff to keep people safe. Relatives told us that the service had actively engaged with them and they were assured that people were well looked after.
There was a robust quality and assurance system in place. The registered manager worked with the provider to monitor the safety and quality of care provided to people. Staff worked with other healthcare professionals to make sure people had the correct support they needed.
Staffing levels were appropriate to support people. There continued to be a robust recruitment process in place.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection and update
The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 3 December 2019) and there was a breach of the regulations. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.
Why we inspected
We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 30 October 2019. A breach of legal requirements was found. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve safe care and treatment.
We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions Safe and Well-led which contain those requirements.
We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to coronavirus and other infection outbreaks effectively.
The ratings from the previous comprehensive inspection for those key questions not looked at on this occasion were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection. The overall rating for the service has changed from requires improvement to good. This is based on the findings at this inspection.
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Reuben Manor on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.