• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Sandringham Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Escombe Road, Bishop Auckland, DL14 6HT (01388) 660960

Provided and run by:
H G M MEXBOROUGH LLP

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 and 16 February 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 11 and 16 February 2015 and was unannounced. This meant the staff and provider did not know we would be visiting.

The home provides care and accommodation for up to 92 older people. On the day of our inspection there were 88 people using the service. The home has four separate units over three floors.

The home had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The home was last inspected by CQC on 2 and 3 April 2014 and was not compliant. This was because the environment had not been fully adapted to meet the needs of people with dementia.

During this inspection, we found the environment had been fully adapted to meet the needs of people with dementia.

There were sufficient numbers of staff on duty in order to meet the needs of people using the service. The provider had an effective recruitment and selection procedure in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff.

We saw evidence that thorough investigations had been carried out in response to safeguarding incidents or allegations.

We saw a copy of the provider’s complaints policy and procedure and found that complaints had been fully investigated.

We saw comprehensive medication audits were carried out regularly by the provider.

Training records were up to date and staff received regular supervisions and appraisals, which meant that staff were properly supported to provide care to people who used the service.

We saw staff supporting people in the dining rooms at lunch time and choices of food and drinks were being offered. People told us the food was always good with a wide selection of choices available at every meal.

All of the care records we looked at contained care plan agreement forms, which had been signed by the person who used the service or a family member.

The home was clean, spacious and suitable for the people who used the service.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) are part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. They aim to make sure that people in care homes, hospitals and supported living are looked after in a way that does not inappropriately restrict their freedom. We discussed DoLS with the registered manager and looked at records. We found the provider was following the requirements in the DoLS.

People, who used the service, and family members, were complimentary about the standard of care. They told us, “This is a wonderful place; all the staff are caring it gives me peace of mind knowing that my mother is so well cared for.” A resident said, “I chose to come here, it was the only place I considered and have no regrets.”

We saw staff supporting and helping to maintain people’s independence. We saw staff treated people with dignity and respect and people were encouraged to remain as independent as possible.

We saw that the home had a full programme of activities in place for people who used the service.

On both days of our inspection, we saw people were actively involved in a range of activities.

All the care records we looked at showed people’s needs were assessed before they moved into the home and we saw care plans were written in a person centred way that always involved people or their representatives.

We saw the provider worked in partnership with other health and social care professionals.

The provider had a quality assurance system in place and gathered information about the quality of their service from a variety of sources.

2, 3 April 2014

During a routine inspection

In this report the name of a registered manager appears who was not in post and not managing the regulatory activities at this location at the time of the inspection. Their name appears because they were still a registered manager on our register at the time.

During our inspection we asked the provider, staff and people who used the service specific questions; is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

Is the service safe?

People using the service told us they felt safe. We found safeguarding procedures to be good and staff we spoke with understood how to safeguard the people they supported.

Systems were in place to make sure that the registered manager and staff learned from events such as accidents and incidents, complaints, concerns, whistleblowing and investigations.

The home had proper policies and procedures in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

The registered manager wrote the staff rotas. She told us she took people's care needs into account when making decisions about the staffing numbers, qualifications, skills and experience required. This helped to make sure people's needs were met.

Is the service effective?

People's health and care needs were assessed with them. Specialist dietary, social, mobility, equipment and dementia care needs had been identified in care plans where required.

The environment had not been fully adapted to meet the needs of people dementia. This was because people's needs were not always taken into account with signage and appropriate colours.

Is the service caring?

People told us they were supported by kind and attentive staff. Comments from people using the service included 'The staff are very nice and helpful. They always listen to me or if they are in the middle of something they always come back to me. I used to be a nurse so I know.'

People using the service, their relatives, friends and staff completed an annual satisfaction survey. The registered manager told us where shortfalls or concerns were raised this was discussed with people and an action plan developed.

People's preferences, interests, likes, dislikes and different needs were written down in their care plans.

Is the service responsive?

People took part in a range of activities in and outside the service regularly. Specialist activities were also provided to meet the needs of people with advanced dementia.

People we spoke with knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy.

Is the service well-led?

The service had a quality assurance system. The records we looked at showed any shortfalls were addressed quickly.