Updated 22 July 2022
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was completed by two inspectors and an Expert by Experience who made phone calls to peoples relatives. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service provides care and support to people living in supported living settings. So that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
The service had a manager who was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. This means that at the present time the provider is legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was given 24hrs notice to enable the manager to gain permission from people to visit their homes and to ensure the manager would be in the office to support the inspection,
What we did before inspection
The provider was asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We sought information from the Local Authority. We reviewed information we had received about the service since it was registered. We used this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with two people who used the service about their experience of the care provided. Where people were unable to talk with us, we used observation to help us understand their experience of using the service.
We spoke with four members of staff and the manager. We reviewed four people's care files and four staff personnel files, including information about staff training and supervision data. We looked at the service’s medication practices and information relating to the service’s quality assurance arrangements.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We reviewed additional information relating to the service’s quality assurance arrangements. We contacted eight people’s relatives so that we could talk to them about their experience of the care provided for their family member.