• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Sidcup PET-CT Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Queen Mary's Hospital, Frognal Avenue, Sidcup, Kent, DA14 6LT (020) 8194 4444

Provided and run by:
Alliance Medical Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Sidcup PET-CT Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Sidcup PET-CT Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

20 April 2022

During a routine inspection

This was the first time we rated the service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff reviewed referrals to identify risks to patients and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Key services were available to provide care within defined time scales.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity and took account of their individual needs. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • Not all staff were sure who to call if a patient was rapidly deteriorating.
  • Patient’s told us they found the leaflet about parking confusing.
  • Not all folders were updated with policies when they were printed.
  • The service was recruiting more staff but while this was being processed the service manager was having to work clinically and so relied upon support from other managers.