Updated 17 December 2020
The inspection
As part of a pilot into virtual inspections of domiciliary and extra-care housing services, the Care Quality Commission conducted an inspection of this provider on 04 November 2020. The inspection was carried out with the consent of the provider and was part of a pilot to gather information to inform CQC whether it might be possible to conduct inspections in a different way in the future. We completed this inspection using virtual methods and online tools such as electronic file sharing, video calls and phone calls to gather the information we rely on to form a judgement on the care and support provided. At no time did we visit the provider’s or location’s office as we usually would when conducting an inspection.
Inspection team
The inspection team consisted of two inspectors, a medicines inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure the provider or registered manager would be available to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 09 November 2020 and ended on 30 November 2020.
Before the inspection
Prior to our inspection we checked all the information we held about the service. This included any notifications the service is required to send to us by law, any allegations of abuse or feedback about the service. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
The provider had submitted a completed provider information return prior to this focussed virtual inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
During the inspection-
We spoke with four people who used the service and eight relatives about their experience of the care provided. Everyone provided us with positive comments. We spoke with nine members of staff, including the registered manager. We reviewed a range of records. These included five care files, medication administration records, three staff files, training records and associated documentation relating to the operation and management of the service.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality assurance records.