We carried out an announced, comprehensive inspection on 10 January 2019 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?
Our findings were:
Are services safe?
We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services effective?
We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services caring?
We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services responsive?
We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services well-led?
We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the practice was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
CQC previously inspected the service on 3 October 2017 and asked the provider to make improvements because it was not using clinical audits to drive improvements in patient outcomes. We judged the provider had breached Regulation 17 (1) (Good governance) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. At our 10 January 2019 inspection, we checked this area and found the area of concern had been resolved.
The Hill Medical Centre was established in 2011 and registered with the Care Quality Commission in 2013. The practice operates a private GP service for patients providing consultations and private prescriptions.
The principal doctor is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
We received 20 completed Care Quality Commission comment cards all of which were positive about the staff at the practice and the services received. We did not speak with patients directly at the inspection.
Our key findings were:
- The provider had acted since our last inspection and introduced a programme of
regular audits to assess, monitor and improve the quality of the service.
- The practice reviewed the effectiveness of the care it provided and acted to ensure care and treatment were delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
- Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
- Services were provided to meet the needs of patients.
- Patient feedback for the services offered was positive.
- Practice management and governance arrangements supported the delivery of high-quality and person-centred care.
There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:
- Review protocols to ensure that periodic water temperature monitoring is undertaken in accordance with the service’s recent Legionella risk assessment.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth
BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care