- NHS mental health service
MH Services (CPFT) at Addenbrookes
All Inspections
During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made
We saw incidents were discussed, investigated and referred to the local authority when required for further investigation. Minutes of meetings showed information on safeguarding was discussed on a regular basis.
Two standard questions were added to the clinical supervision form, asking about any safeguarding concerns.
Recruitment to additional nursing posts had been completed and an occupational therapist post filled. The organisation developed a retention plan for retaining staff once appointed. A protocol for managing staff shortage was developed in September 2013, and is used by the ward to fill shifts on a day to day basis.
12 July 2013
During a routine inspection
A range of information was available to people and people were involved in some aspects of the running of the ward. One person said they had been involved in staff recruitment interviews.
People's care plans were comprehensive, individualised and had been reviewed at least weekly to ensure they accurately reflected people's changing needs. Any potential risks to people had been assessed and plans had been put in place to minimise the risks.
Three people told us they felt safe on the ward and staff confirmed they had received training in safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. However, one person had raised some issues, which we found had not been referred appropriately using the ward's safeguarding procedures. This meant that the processes in place were not robust enough to ensure that people were kept safe.
Staff had received training in a range of topics and told us they felt well supported by the management team. However, there were not enough staff on duty at all times to meet the needs of all the people on the ward.
People we spoke with knew how to make a complaint if they needed to.