Updated 24 April 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This was a focused inspection and was prompted in part due to anonymous information of concern received by CQC related to safe recruitment and staff training, also management of accidents and incidents.
Inspection team
This inspection was carried out by two inspectors.
Service and service type
Lowmoor Care Home is a care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager who was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. This means they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and any improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with two people who used the service and two relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with six members of staff including a nurse, care staff, domestic, laundry, the manager and the provider.
We reviewed a range of records. This included eight people’s care records and multiple medicines records. We looked at three staff files in relation to their recruitment and supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We requested further documents to support the evidence. We spoke with three relatives by telephone to ask about their experience of the service.