• Care Home
  • Care home

Tree Tops

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Campden Road, South Croydon, Surrey, CR2 7EQ (020) 8680 1219

Provided and run by:
Tamarind Care Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 7 August 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

This inspection was carried out by a single inspector.

Service and service type

Tree Tops is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection site visit took place on 12 July 2019 and was unannounced.

What we did

The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.

As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection we spoke with one person using the service and following our inspection we spoke with two relatives by telephone to seek their feedback. People living at the home had varying levels of communication and some people were unable to share their views and experiences, so we therefore used our Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experiences of people who could not talk with us. We spent time observing the support provided to people in communal areas, at meal times and the interactions between people and staff.

We also met and spoke with the registered manager and three support workers. We reviewed a range of records including four people’s care plans and records and three staff recruitment, training and supervision records. We also reviewed records used in managing the service for example, policies and procedures, monitoring records and minutes of meetings.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 7 August 2019

About the service

Tree Tops is a care home that provides accommodation and personal care support for up to ten adults with learning disabilities some of whom may also have physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection the home was fully occupied.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service

People and their relatives spoke positively about the care and support received. During our inspection we observed that staff interacted well with people and had built good relationship’s and rapport with them.

Relatives told us they felt their loved ones were safe and well supported. Safeguarding and whistleblowing policies and procedures were in place and staff were aware of the procedures and how to keep people safe. People were protected from identified risks and plans were in place to manage risks safely in the least restrictive way.

There were arrangements in place to manage medicines safely and staff followed appropriate infection control practices to prevent the spread of infections. Appropriate recruitment checks took place before staff started work. There were sufficient staff available to meet people's needs. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to support people appropriately. Staff were supported through induction, training and supervision.

People were supported to meet their nutritional needs and to maintain a balanced diet ensuring continued well-being. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. The home environment was clean, homely and suitably adapted to meet the needs of the people living there. People had individualised rooms with personal items.

People and their relatives were involved and consulted about their care and support needs. People had access to health and social care professionals as required. People were supported to access community service and to participate in activities of their choosing that met their needs.

Staff worked with people to promote their rights and understood the Equality Act 2010; supporting people appropriately addressing any protected characteristics. There were systems in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality of the service. The service worked in partnership with health and social care professionals to ensure appropriate support was provided to individuals.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: Good (Report was published on 13 January 2017).

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.