Water Orton Dental Centre

On this page

• Overview
• Person-centred Care
• Care provision, Integration and continuity
• Providing Information
• Listening to and involving people
• Equity in access
• Equity in experiences and outcomes
• Planning for the future

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations and had taken into consideration appropriate guidance.

Find out what we look at when we assess this area in our information about our new Single assessment framework.

The judgement for Person-centred Care is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.

The judgement for Care provision, Integration and continuity is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.

The judgement for Providing Information is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.

The judgement for Listening to and involving people is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.

Leaders and staff described the reasonable adjustments they had made to ensure the practice was accessible. For example, information could be made available in large print or alternative formats and a magnifying glass was available for visually impaired patients. The ground floor of the practice including the reception, waiting room and treatment rooms were all wheelchair accessible. Language translation was available as needed. Following this assessment, we were sent evidence to demonstrate that a hearing induction loop had been purchased in order to assist patients who wore hearing aids. A poster was developed informing patients of the accessible information standard and advising those that had a disability, impairment or sensory loss to inform reception so that they could be assisted to get information that they could access and understand, and so that the practice could provide any communication support needed. Staff were clear about the importance of providing emotional support to patients when delivering care.

Staff had carried out a disability access audit and had formulated an action plan to continually improve access for patients. The practice supported more vulnerable members of society such as patients living with dementia or adults and children with a learning disability. The practice displayed its opening hours and provided information on their website, patient information leaflet and social media page. The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. The practice provided telephone numbers for patients needing emergency dental treatment during the working day and when the practice was not open. At the time of our assessment, patients who needed an urgent appointment were offered one in a timely manner. When the practice was unable to offer an urgent appointment, they worked with partner organisations to support urgent access for patients. The practice had a weekday urgent care support contract to support those patients with a dental emergency who had contacted NHS 111.

The judgement for Equity in experiences and outcomes is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.

The judgement for Planning for the future is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Responsive key question.