• Dentist
  • Dentist

INE Dental Practice

316a Malden Road, New Malden, Surrey, KT3 6AU

Provided and run by:
Dr. Woo Seung Chung

All Inspections

27/06/2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of INE Dental Practice on 27 June 2023. This inspection was carried out to review the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor and a second CQC inspector.

We had previously undertaken a comprehensive inspection of INE Dental Practice on 25 October 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective, responsive and well-led care and was in breach of regulations 12,13,17,18 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We undertook immediate enforcement action and the provider`s CQC registration to carry on the regulated activities was suspended for a period of 3 months. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for INE Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

We also previously undertook a follow up focused inspection of INE Dental Practice where we asked is it safe and well-led on 23 November 2022 and we noted that the provider had completed a significant amount of work to meet our requirements and the period of suspension was terminated on 24 November 2022. At this inspection on 23 November 2022, we found the provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for INE Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met we require the service to make improvements. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

  • Is it effective?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 25 October 2022.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 25 October 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspections on 25 October 2022 and 22 November 2022.

Background

INE Dental Practice is in New Malden within the London Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children. The practice advised us that the majority of the patients are members of the local Korean community.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, a trainee dental nurse, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the trainee dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday from 9.30am to 6pm

Saturday from 9.30 to 1.30pm

The practice is closed on Wednesdays

23/11/2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of INE Dental Practice on 23 November 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of INE Dental Practice on 25 October 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective, responsive and well led care and was in breach of regulations 12, 13, 17,18 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We undertook immediate enforcement action and the provider`s CQC registration to carry on the regulated activities was suspended for a period of 3 months. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for INE Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk. At our follow-up inspection on 23 November 2022, we noted that the provider and staff had completed a significant amount of work to meet our requirements and the period of suspension was terminated on 24 November 2022.

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements. We did not assess whether the registered provider was providing effective or responsive care on this occasion as no patients had been seen since the enforcement action was taken.

We will inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 25 October 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls we found at our inspection on 25 October 2022.

Background

INE Dental Practice is in New Malden within the London Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children. The practice advised us that the majority of the patients are members of the local Korean community.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, a dental nurse, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday from 9.30am to 6pm

Saturday from 9.30 to 1.30pm

The practice is closed on Wednesdays

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should

Improve the practice's processes for the control and storage of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken and the products are stored securely.

25/10/2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 25 October 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The dental clinic was not clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider’s infection control procedures did not reflect published guidance.
  • Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were not available.
  • The provider did not operate systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • There were ineffective processes in place to prevent abuse of vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice did not have staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Improvements were needed to ensure that clinical staff kept up to date with current guidelines, and information related to patient care was suitably recorded within the dental care records.
  • Improvements were needed to protect patients’ privacy within the treatment rooms
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs. There was scope to improve access to out of hours advice.
  • There were ineffective systems to support continuous improvement.
  • There were ineffective systems to ensure that staff were up to date with their training.
  • There was ineffective leadership and a lack of oversight for the day-to-day management of the service.
  • There were ineffective systems to ensure facilities were safe and equipment was serviced and maintained according to manufacturers` guidance.

Due to the nature of the concerns the provider was issued with a letter stating our intention to take urgent enforcement action. They were given an opportunity to submit (within one working day) an action plan as to how they would mitigate the risks identified by our inspection. The provider submitted an action plan after the deadline, which included the urgent actions they had taken and further improvements they had planned. We judged the improvements proposed were not of a sufficient nature to mitigate the risks we undertook immediate enforcement action. The provider’s CQC registration to undertake regulated activities is suspended for a period of three months.

Following our inspection, the provider has submitted evidence of the action they have taken in response to the concerns we identified on inspection. We will be reviewing this at the follow up inspection.

Background

INE Dental Practice is in New Malden within the London Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children. The practice advised us that the majority of the patients are members of the local Korean community.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, a dental nurse, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday from 9.30am to 6pm

Saturday from 9.30 to 1.30pm

The practice is closed on Wednesdays.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Ensure patients are protected from abuse and improper treatment
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out their duties
  • Ensure specified information is available regarding each person employed.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry.

17 February 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our visit in January 2014 we saw that some of the emergency medication was out of date and the portable oxygen was not easily accessible.

We saw on this visit that the emergency medication had been replaced and was located in the treatment room with the portable oxygen and the defibrillator.

6 January 2014

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with the dental nurse and we contacted three patients via email for their feedback about the care they received.

There were a range of consent forms and information leaflets available for people which were provided in both English and Korean. The people we contacted confirmed that they had received detailed treatment plans including costs which they had signed.

The practice had a clear procedure for the cleaning and sterilisation of reusable equipment and the treatment areas were clean.

The majority of the emergency medication at the practice was out of date and the portable oxygen was not easily accessible in the case of an emergency.

There was information displayed explaining the complaints procedure and a leaflet about the dental practice available in reception.

People told us they were happy with the treatment they had received and felt the staff were suitably trained.