Background to this inspection
Updated
24 November 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
This service provides care and support to people living in one ‘supported living’ setting made up of separate flats, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since registration. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with five relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with six members of staff including the registered manager, deputy manager, and care workers. We observed care and support with five people to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.
We reviewed a range of records. This included four people’s care records and multiple medication records. We looked at two staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality assurance records. We spoke with two professionals who regularly visit the service.
Updated
24 November 2021
Bradbury Court is a supported living service providing personal care and support for people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. At the time of the inspection the service was provided to eight people living in their own flats in an adapted building with shared space and an office where staff are based.
People's experience of using this service and what we found
People's privacy, dignity and confidentiality were respected by caring staff. Staff listened to people and communicated with them in the most accessible way. People were encouraged to be as independent as possible and staff spoke proudly of people's achievements.
Relatives told us they thought their family members were safe, two relatives said their family member was always happy to return to Bradbury Court after visiting their home.
There were policies and procedures regarding the safeguarding of adults and staff knew what action to take if they thought anyone was at risk of potential harm.
Risk assessments were carried out to make sure people received their care safely and had opportunities to take part in activities which interested them and promoted their independence.
Medicines were managed safely, and staff had a good knowledge of the medicine systems and procedures. Staff had received training and had competency assessments of their practice.
There were adequate numbers of staff to meet care needs and the service were actively recruiting more staff.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right Support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.
This service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture.
Right support: • Model of care and setting maximises people's choice, control and Independence. The service follows the social model of support; for example, people all live in their own flats with suitable equipment to meet their needs.
Right care: • Care is person-centred and promotes people's dignity, privacy and human rights. The registered manager and staff knew people well, each person had support unique to them.
Right culture: • Ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensure people using services lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives. People were spoken to with equity by staff and their consent and views were sought.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection This service was registered with us on 25 November 2019 and this is the first inspection.
Why we inspected
This was a planned first inspection following registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all supported living inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information, we may inspect sooner.