Updated 10 June 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
This inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
A new manager had started in post two weeks prior to the inspection and was planning to submit an application to register with the Care Quality Commission. This will mean that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider and the care manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 19 May 2021 and ended on 25 May 2020. We visited the office location on 19 and 25 May 2021.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
During the office site visit we looked at records, which included three people's care and medicines records. We checked recruitment, training and supervision records for three care givers. We also looked at a range of records about how the service was managed. We spoke with the provider, the care manager, and two office administrators responsible for the recruitment and the scheduling of client visits.
After the inspection
We telephoned four people using the service and, five relatives about their experience of using the service. We spoke with six care givers on their experience of working for the agency. We also emailed two external health and social care professionals who responded and gave us their views about the service. We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found such as requesting further information about training, quality assurance and safeguarding procedures.