Updated 10 May 2022
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
Registered Manager
This service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. An experienced senior manager was overseeing the service.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection. Inspection activity started on 05 April and ended on 07 April. We visited the office location on 5 April 2022.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service, including notifications the provider must tell us about, for example safeguarding concerns. We sought feedback from the health and social care professionals who work with the service. The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with the nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider. We spoke with six other members of staff including the head of operations, quality assurance staff, coordinator and care workers. We received written feedback from five other staff members. We spoke with five people who use the service and five relatives about their experience of the care provided. We reviewed a range of records, including five peoples’ assessments and care records. We looked at five staff files in relation to recruitment, training and staff supervision. We also reviewed policies, procedures, complaints and compliments.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at accidents, incidents and safeguarding data, meeting notes, training records and the service user guide.